영국에서 과학자들이 인간과 동물의 혼합 배아를 비밀리 배양“ 과학자들은 150개 이상의 인간 –동물 혼합 배아를 영국의 실험실들에서 만들어 왔습니다. 과학자들은 광범위한 질병의 치료제 개발의 가능성을 살펴 보고자 지난 3년여동안 이런 혼합 배아를 만들어 온것을 은닉해왔습니다.”

동물과 사람을 배아 속에서 섞는 일은 노아의 홍수전에 사람들이 동물과 사람의 혼혈종을 만들었던 역사를 우리에게 상기하게 해줍니다. 과학자들이 기괴한 모습의 생물체를 탄생 시킬 개연성이 열리고 있습니다. 이는 하나님께서 정해 놓으신 자연의 질서를 파괴할 뿐 아니라 생물들의 종 사이에 대혼란을 초래하게 될것입니다. 유전자 조작을 통한 어떤 종류의 배아 생성도 법적으로 보호해 주는 법으로서 2008년에 영국에서 발효된 “인간의 수정과 발생에 관한 법” 이 시행 된 이래 과학자들은 인간과 동물의 혼합 태아 155건 이상을 만들어 온것입니다. 

이는 동물의 난자에 사람의 정자를 수정하는 방식의 교잡 배아 즉 인간의 핵이 동물의 세포 안에 심겨지는것을 방식이 있고 또 소위 ‘키메라’ (괴물)라고 일컫는 사람의 세포들과 동물의 배아들을 섞는 방식으로 실험이 이루어져 왔습니다.

과학자들은 배아 줄기 세포를 통해 불치병 치료를 위한 치료법을 개발하기 위해 필요한 실험들이라고 그 실험을 정당화 하고 있습니다. 이런 변명이 굉장히 설득력 있게 들릴지 모르지만 사실 살펴보면 의학적으로 인류에 유익을 줄만한 성과를 거두고 있는 연구들은 대부분 성인 줄기 세포 연구 분야에서 나온것들며 배아 줄기 세포 연구분야에서 나온 성과들이 아님을 알 수 있습니다. 인간과 동물의 혼합 태아에서 슈퍼 괴생물체를 만들어 내고 싶은 욕망은 , 줄기 세포 연구가 의학적으로 인류에 공헌할 것이냐 도덕적으로 수많은 문제를 일으킬 것이냐 하는 논란을 통해, 교묘히 숨겨져 온것입니다. 

“영국내에 3개의 실험실 (런던 킹스 칼리지, 뉴케슬 대학, 워윅 대학)은 2008년 법안이 통과 된후 실험 면허를 받은 대학들 입니다.

“홍수로 인류를 멸망시키게 만든 죄악중의 죄악은 인간과 동물의 종의 교합(잡종,혼종)이었다. 이로 인해 인간속에 있는 하나님의 형상이 더럽혀 졌으며 어디에나 혼돈과 혼란이 있었다. 하나님께서는 장수하고 강한 체력을 갖고 있던 그들이 타락하고 부패하므로 말미암아 홍수로 그들을 멸하기로 결정하셨다. 하나님은 수백년의 수명이 다하여 죽을때가지 그들이 고통당하는것을 원치 아니하셨다.” (영적 선물 3권 69 페이지 영문)

출처 

http://www.ktfministry.org/ko/news/2551/-

=============================================================================================

아래 링크와 영문기사 참조

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2017818/Embryos-involving-genes-animals-mixed-humans-produced-secretively-past-years.html#ixzz1i5bwHyj0

150 human animal hybrids grown in UK labs: Embryos have been produced secretively for the past three years

 

Scientists have created more than 150 human-animal hybrid embryos in British laboratories.

 

The hybrids have been produced secretively over the past three years by researchers looking into possible cures for a wide range of diseases.

 

The revelation comes just a day after a committee of scientists warned of a nightmare ‘Planet of the Apes’ scenario in which work on human-animal creations goes too far.

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority is currently considering whether donors can be paid for their services

 

Last night a campaigner against the excesses of medical research said he was disgusted that scientists were ‘dabbling in the grotesque’.

 

Figures seen by the Daily Mail show that 155 ‘admixed’ embryos, containing both human and animal genetic material, have been created since the introduction of the 2008 Human Fertilisation Embryology Act.

 

This legalised the creation of a variety of hybrids, including an animal egg fertilised by a human sperm; ‘cybrids’, in which a human nucleus is implanted into an animal cell; and ‘chimeras’, in which human cells are mixed with animal embryos.

 

Hospital hoping to save cash tells families to stop visiting sick relatives and instead call them on SKYPETHIRTY embryos created for every baby born by IVF... and thousands are thrown away

 Beware 'Planet of the Apes' experiments that could create sci-fi nightmareBrowse our babycare products on MailLife.co.uk

 

Scientists say the techniques can be used to develop embryonic stem cells which can be used to treat a range of incurable illnesses.

 

Three labs in the UK – at King’s College London, Newcastle University and Warwick University – were granted licences to carry out the research after the Act came into force. 

All have now stopped creating hybrid embryos due to a lack of funding, but scientists believe that there will be more such work in the future.

The figure was revealed to crossbench peer Lord Alton following a Parliamentary question.

Research centre: Warwick University has been growing animal human hybrids over the last three years

 

Last night he said: ‘I argued in Parliament against the creation of human- animal hybrids as a matter of principle. None of the scientists who appeared before us could give us any justification in terms of treatment.

 

‘Ethically it can never be justifiable – it discredits us as a country. It is dabbling in the grotesque.

 

‘At every stage the justification from scientists has been: if only you allow us to do this, we will find cures for every illness known to mankind. This is emotional blackmail.

 

‘Of the 80 treatments and cures which have come about from stem cells, all have come from adult stem cells – not embryonic ones.

‘On moral and ethical grounds this fails; and on scientific and medical ones too.’ 

Josephine Quintavalle, of pro-life group Comment on Reproductive Ethics, said: ‘I am aghast that this is going on and we didn’t know anything about it.

 

‘Why have they kept this a secret? If they are proud of what they are doing, why do we need to ask Parliamentary questions for this to come to light?

 

‘The problem with many scientists is that they want to do things because they want to experiment. That is not a good enough rationale.’ 

Test centre: Newcastle University was another site where human animal hybrid testing was being undertaken

 

Earlier this week, a group of leading scientists warned about ‘Planet of the Apes’ experiments. They called for new rules to prevent lab animals being given human attributes, for example by injecting human stem cells into the brains of primates.

 

But the lead author of their report,  Professor Robin Lovell-Badge, from the Medical Research Council’ s National Institute for Medical Research, said the scientists were not concerned about human-animal hybrid embryos because by law these have to be destroyed within 14 days.

 

He said: ‘The reason for doing these experiments is to understand more about early human development and come up with ways of curing serious diseases, and as a scientist I feel there is a moral imperative to pursue this research.

 

‘As long as we have sufficient controls – as we do in this country – we should be proud of the research.’

 

However, he called for stricter controls on another type of embryo research, in which animal embryos are implanted with a small amount of human genetic material.

 

Human-animal hybrids are also created in other countries, many of which have little or no regulation.